3rd June 2012
Reblogged From castiel-of-winterfell
Notes: 19262
(Source: whumpresource)
Benedict Cumberbatch portraying a convincing southern american woman.
‘PHOO-WEE’
THE TEARS
FAR OUT THIS IS THE BEST THING I HAVE EVER HEARD
CRYING
I
CANNOT
HANDLE
THIS
(Source: alaskan-bullw0rm)
Played 104268 times.
ORGASM
I like how he kind of turns suhthurn at the end.
(Source: phone-blue-box)
Played 24457 times.DEAR GODS OF INCESTUOUS NORNS.
I can’t even begin to explain how exceptionally brilliant this editing is.
There are no words for this perfection.
-
I wasn’t sure if this was on here yet but if it was…THEN IT MUST BE REVIVED AGAIN.
Oh my god best movie. :’)
<3
No joke. My dad tells me that when I was a little girl (under the age of 1) I would wake him up in the middle of the night and ask to watch “Hound Dog”. Such a good movie.
(Source: peacewithoutreligion)
In which Steve takes a picture to prove to Tony he knows how to use an iPod. Unfortunately he’s still really bad at using his cellphone and sends it to the wrong contact.
DADS NO
(Source: gifspixar)
Because instantly alienating a huge chunk of your demographic through offensive humour is the best way to sell soda pop. (x)
(Source: raltimore)
(Source: spumonis)
PROBLEM: Women’s bare bodies are on display in billboards, movie posters, and many other kinds of ads. Though plenty of studies have looked at the ramifications of this pervasive sexual objectification, it’s unclear if we see near-naked people as human beings or if we really do view them as mere objects.
METHODOLOGY: Researchers led by Philippe Bernard presented participants pictures of men and women in sexualized poses, wearing a swimsuit or underwear, one by one on a computer screen. Since pictures of people present a recognition problem when they’re turned upside down, but images of objects don’t have that problem, some of the photos were presented right side up and others upside down. After each picture, there was a second of black screen before each participant was shown two images and was asked to choose the one that matched the one he or she had just seen.
RESULTS: The male and female subjects matched the photos similarly. They recognized right-side-up men better than upside-down men, suggesting that they saw the sexualized men as persons. On the contrary, the women in underwear weren’t any harder to recognize when they appeared upside down, indicating that the sexy women were consistently identified as objects.
CONCLUSION: People objectify women in sexualized photos, but not men.
SOURCE: The full study, “Integrating Sexual Objectification With Object Versus Person Recognition: The Sexualized-Body-Inversion Hypothesis,” is published in the journal Psychological Science.
